alexander/intro-to-python
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Activity

Streamline text

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Hess 2020-02-05 18:25:39 +01:00
commit 3bbcc3a04d
4 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
06_text_00_lecture.ipynb
View file

@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
}
},
"source": [
"A `str` object evaluates to itself in a literal notation with enclosing **single quotes** `'` by default. In [Chapter 1](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/master/01_elements_00_lecture.ipynb#Value), we already specified the double quotes `\"` convention we stick to in this book. Yet, single quotes `'` and double quotes `\"` are *perfect* substitutes for all `str` objects that do *not* contain any of the two symbols in it. We could use the reverse convention, as well.\n",
"A `str` object evaluates to itself in a literal notation with enclosing **single quotes** `'` by default. In [Chapter 1](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/master/01_elements_00_lecture.ipynb#Value-/-\"Meaning\"), we already specified the double quotes `\"` convention we stick to in this book. Yet, single quotes `'` and double quotes `\"` are *perfect* substitutes for all `str` objects that do *not* contain any of the two symbols in it. We could use the reverse convention, as well.\n",
"\n",
"As [this discussion](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56011/single-quotes-vs-double-quotes-in-python) shows, many programmers have *strong* opinions about that and make up *new* conventions for their projects. Consequently, the discussion was \"closed as not constructive\" by the moderators."
]