Release 0.1.0

After refurbishing the project we prepare a new relaease.
There are no changes with respect to the contents as compared to v0.0.0
that are noteworthy release notes.
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Hess 2024-04-08 22:13:31 +02:00
commit 94e5112f10
Signed by: alexander
GPG key ID: 344EA5AB10D868E0
65 changed files with 387 additions and 387 deletions

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
}
},
"source": [
"**Note**: Click on \"*Kernel*\" > \"*Restart Kernel and Clear All Outputs*\" in [JupyterLab](https://jupyterlab.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) *before* reading this notebook to reset its output. If you cannot run this file on your machine, you may want to open it [in the cloud <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_mb.png\">](https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/webartifex/intro-to-python/develop?urlpath=lab/tree/07_sequences/03_content.ipynb)."
"**Note**: Click on \"*Kernel*\" > \"*Restart Kernel and Clear All Outputs*\" in [JupyterLab](https://jupyterlab.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) *before* reading this notebook to reset its output. If you cannot run this file on your machine, you may want to open it [in the cloud <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_mb.png\">](https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/webartifex/intro-to-python/main?urlpath=lab/tree/07_sequences/03_content.ipynb)."
]
},
{
@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
"\n",
"The revised `add_xyz()` function below is more natural to reason about as it does *not* modify the passed in `arg` internally. [PythonTutor <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_py.png\">](http://pythontutor.com/visualize.html#code=letters%20%3D%20%5B%22a%22,%20%22b%22,%20%22c%22%5D%0A%0Adef%20add_xyz%28arg%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20new_arg%20%3D%20arg%5B%3A%5D%0A%20%20%20%20new_arg.extend%28%5B%22x%22,%20%22y%22,%20%22z%22%5D%29%0A%20%20%20%20return%20new_arg%0A%0Aletters_with_xyz%20%3D%20add_xyz%28letters%29&cumulative=false&curstr=0&heapPrimitives=nevernest&mode=display&origin=opt-frontend.js&py=3&rawInputLstJSON=%5B%5D&textReferences=false) shows that as well. This approach is following the **[functional programming <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_wiki.png\">](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming)** paradigm that is going through a \"renaissance\" currently. Two essential characteristics of functional programming are that a function *never* changes its inputs and *always* returns the same output given the same inputs.\n",
"\n",
"For a beginner, it is probably better to stick to this idea and not change any arguments as the original `add_xyz()` above. However, functions that modify and return the argument passed in are an important aspect of object-oriented programming, as explained in [Chapter 11 <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/develop/11_classes/00_content.ipynb)."
"For a beginner, it is probably better to stick to this idea and not change any arguments as the original `add_xyz()` above. However, functions that modify and return the argument passed in are an important aspect of object-oriented programming, as explained in [Chapter 11 <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/main/11_classes/00_content.ipynb)."
]
},
{
@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@
}
},
"source": [
"In the \"*List Operations*\" section in the [second part <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/develop/07_sequences/01_content.ipynb#List-Operations) of this chapter, the `*` symbol **unpacks** the elements of a `list` object into another one. This idea of *iterable unpacking* is built into Python at various places, even *without* the `*` symbol.\n",
"In the \"*List Operations*\" section in the [second part <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/main/07_sequences/01_content.ipynb#List-Operations) of this chapter, the `*` symbol **unpacks** the elements of a `list` object into another one. This idea of *iterable unpacking* is built into Python at various places, even *without* the `*` symbol.\n",
"\n",
"For example, we may write variables on the left-hand side of a `=` statement in a literal `tuple` style. Then, any *finite* iterable on the right-hand side is unpacked. So, `numbers` is unpacked into *twelve* variables below."
]
@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@
}
},
"source": [
"Unpacking allows us to rewrite the iterative `fibonacci()` function from [Chapter 4 <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/develop/04_iteration/02_content.ipynb#\"Hard-at-first-Glance\"-Example:-Fibonacci-Numbers-%28revisited%29) in a concise way."
"Unpacking allows us to rewrite the iterative `fibonacci()` function from [Chapter 4 <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/main/04_iteration/02_content.ipynb#\"Hard-at-first-Glance\"-Example:-Fibonacci-Numbers-%28revisited%29) in a concise way."
]
},
{
@ -2376,7 +2376,7 @@
}
},
"source": [
"In the \"*Packing & Unpacking with Functions*\" [exercise <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/develop/07_sequences/04_exercises.ipynb), we look at `product()` in more detail.\n",
"In the \"*Packing & Unpacking with Functions*\" [exercise <img height=\"12\" style=\"display: inline-block\" src=\"../static/link/to_nb.png\">](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/webartifex/intro-to-python/blob/main/07_sequences/04_exercises.ipynb), we look at `product()` in more detail.\n",
"\n",
"While we needed to unpack `one_hundred` above to avoid the semantic error, unpacking an argument in a function call may also be a convenience in general. For example, to print the elements of `one_hundred` in one line, we need to use a `for` statement, until now. With unpacking, we get away *without* a loop."
]